FIRST PARTICIPATIVE FORUM HELD
On Saturday, November 6, we organized an experimental participative forum in which citizens contrasted their opinions and sought common solutions. The topic of the first participatory forum was the PDR for the pedestrian-cycling bridge connecting New Belgrade and Ada Ciganlija.
In addition to citizens and experts, relevant representatives of institutions were also invited to participate in the public discussion on the proposed plan (commissioner and developer of the plan, plan maker, city planner), but they all refused to talk to the citizens. Despite the formal commitment to participation, our institutions and authorities are structurally closed to it.
According to the existing regulations, citizens in the process of adopting urban plans have the right to express their opinion on the plan and to propose possible changes in two instances - early public review (where the developer presents the concept of the plan) and public review with a public session (where the draft plan is presented and at the session, he discusses objections and arguments for their adoption or rejection). In addition to the fact that in such a procedure the influence of citizens is reduced to a mere statement about an already proposed idea, informing citizens about the plans is insufficient, and their objections are often rejected without adequate explanation.
The collective of the Ministry of Space strongly believes that citizens have the right and capacity to, with adequate information and through discussion with interested parties, shape their neighborhoods and their city. We started participatory forums based on the example of civil assemblies that are already institutionalized in some countries, and in Serbia they were realized for the first time in the organization of the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory in 2020. The assemblies themselves are structured as a series of discussions between citizens, experts and representatives of institutions, with the assumption that all of them bearers of different interests, but also of relevant knowledge, in order to eventually formulate and agree on possible common positions and proposals through a series of discussions. On the trail of that model, with the idea of systematically influencing the development of participation in the adoption, specifically, of planning documents and opening up new opportunities for more meaningful participation of citizens, we launched participatory forums.
The topic of the first forum was the Detailed Regulation Plan for the construction of a pedestrian-cycling link between Omladinskih brigada Street and Ada Ciganlija, with a bridge over the Sava River, in the city municipalities of Novi Belgrade and Čukarica, which was presented at an early public inspection from June 15 to 29, 2020. . year. The plan envisages the construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge, the construction of additional parking facilities on the Novobeograd side and the sports hall on the Čukarica side. Citizens from Blocks 70, 70A and 45, organized within various initiatives, have already reacted to the plan through objections at the early public inspection, as well as through actions outside of it.
With the aim of bringing together all interested parties and jointly discussing and devising well-argued proposals for changes to the plan that would be presented for public inspection, we invited the members of the initiatives to participate in the participatory forum. Joint action Block 70 and 70A, For our quay, citizens from block 45 and members of the association Streets for cyclists, as well as experts in the field of traffic and urban planning. Invitations to participate in the forum were also sent to government representatives - to city planner Marko Stojčić (also chairman of the Commission for Plans), representatives of the Secretariat for Urban Planning and Construction Affairs of Belgrade (plan maker), representatives of the Urban Institute (plan maker), representatives of the Directorate for Building Land and Construction of Belgrade, the president of the municipality of New Belgrade. All representatives of the institutions refused to participate, except for two representatives of the Department for Construction and Communal Affairs of the Municipality of New Belgrade.
We believe that this kind of reaction of representatives of institutions and decision-makers in the process of developing a model for greater involvement of citizens in shaping the city is exactly opposed to the idea of public interest that they formally represent. Opening institutions for public discussions for citizens about plans that directly affect their lives should be one of the key steps in the democratization of the entire society.
Thank you to all the citizens who, despite the disinterest of the institutions, participated!
The implementation of Participatory Forums is financially supported by the European Union. #EUzaTEBE
RELATED TEXTS
Objection to changes in the PGR: let's stop the privatization of Belgrade!
Public inspection of this plan lasts until February 24, 2026. which is also the last day to submit objections. The remark must be...
Urban review of the year - it seems that someone is in a hurry
Someone is in such a hurry that there is no time for public discussions, there are no limits for plans, and the rules apply...
Comment on the draft amendments and additions to the general regulation plan (GRP) of the city of Belgrade
With this remark, we point to a deeply problematic and systemically harmful provision proposed in the framework of...
Amendments to the general regulation plan (GPR) - when urban planning becomes an instrument of space privatization
Amendments to the General Regulation Plan (GRP) of Belgrade represent another step in the long-term...
Digital sessions are the last nail in the coffin of citizens' participation in city planning
The new amendments to the Rulebook enable public sessions to take place electronically - just when they are most...
Comment on the expansion plan of Belgrade on the water
This letter does not seek to improve the plan in question in a technical sense, but points to its political...
A handbook for avoiding participation: the case of EXPO
This is how the attempt of the Agency for Spatial Planning and Urbanism of the Republic of Serbia to...
Why don't we abolish planning?
Do you remember the first episode of South Park season 15 where Kyle, agreeing to the terms of service without reading…
Objections to the EXPO plan - rejecting the plan is the only acceptable solution
PPPPN National Stadium 15th phase, which includes...
There is no going back, only forward - the only thing standing in the way is the public interest (EXPO 2027)
Having lived for 30 years in the neoliberal development of the city, we should have already gotten used to the constant deregulation...
A year marked by urban greed
Another year is behind us in which, unfortunately, the lives and health of citizens were collateral damage...
Sign for green
When we remember our childhood, we first remember the fun and games through which we learned about ourselves, about the community and...
The Ministry of Spatial Collective received the second award at the Urbanism Salon
The Ministry of Space collective today won the second prize in the publication category at this...
How is greenery treated in the plans that were previewed during the summer?
We're all finally breathing a sigh of relief because the worst of the summer heat is behind us—and we know, it's not the prettiest #tbt. Still…
How many heat waves can we survive? It depends on the greenery we will have.
The two heat waves that we have experienced this summer, we can safely say, are the most intense in recent years...
There are only traces of greenery in the plans, and increasingly hot summers await us
The practice of publishing early and public insights into urban plans during the summer, during extreme heat and...
Marina Dorćol - citizens asked questions, but there was no one to answer
Yesterday, in the premises of the Urban Planning Institute, a meeting was held with a group of citizens of Dorćol in the heart, in or...
"Whose side are you on?" is the wrong question
Yesterday, the third continuation of the same public session of the Planning Commission on the detailed regulation plan was held...
Plan along the Ostružnica railway line in the water source area
The plan for the detailed regulation of the area between the ring road around Belgrade, Obrenovački puta and the ring road...
The Blok initiative is ours in defense of New Belgrade greenery
In February 2024, the temporary authority of the city of Belgrade made a decision on the development of a detailed plan...
Citizens demand changes to the Marina Dorćol project due to the impact on the environment
At the end of September 2021, the Detailed Regulation Plan for Linijski Park Belgrade was adopted, a project that...
More than 10% of greenery disappeared in Belgrade in 20 years
Green infrastructure is key to living in the city, both health-wise and functionally, in terms of protection...
Declaration on the fate of the Belgrade Fair and the General Staff - Press release
Based on the acclamation expressed opinions of the Forum - more than 350 architects and engineers of various professions...
Remarks on the plan for Hotel Yugoslavia - public inspection
In the period from 15.04. until 20.05.2024. you can send comments on the plan for Hotel Yugoslavia, which is in the same...
In the current plans, greenery only in traces
Currently, there are two plans for detailed regulation on early public inspection, which in their…
What is planned for Avala and Kosmaj?
On the notice board of the City appeared a plan that includes the entire area of Avala and Kosmaj, so...
The forest cannot be converted into commercial facilities - PDR for Zmaj
Draft of amendments and additions to the PDR for the area of the economic zone "motorway" in New Belgrade...
The disappearing city and the emerging city
When we look back at the year 2023, it is clear to us that Belgrade is permanently changing...
A small guide to reading plans
The general division of documents from the field of spatial and urban planning recognizes: planning to...
Land is a limited resource
Land is a limited resource on which there are forests, fields and seas, on land we build our homes...
Where's the plan?
You've probably noticed that you can't publish and announce urban plans and projects just like that...
Citizens assemblies
The collective of the Ministry of Space firmly defends the position that citizens have both the right and the capacity to, as long as...
GUP tailored to a man - but who?
A comprehensive social consensus on common goals and directions of spatial planning of a ...
Report from the fourth forum
The development of Rušnja through the perspective of the needs of its residents: report from the fourth mini-citizen assembly...
Report from another forum
At the beginning of 2022, we held two participatory forums with the topic of General Urban Planning...
BELGRADE 2041
We are in a very specific moment - the preparation of the Belgrade General Urban Plan is underway...
Report from the third forum
On Saturday, March 26, 2022, the fourth participatory forum was held, the topic of which was the Draft PGR...
GUP Belgrade 2041 remarks
An early public inspection of the General Urban Plan of Belgrade until 2041 is underway. Three years after...
Return the changes to the PGR of Belgrade to the beginning
Due to a large number of irregularities accompanying the drafting of the Draft Amendments to the Plan of General Regulations...
In a year of uncertainty, one thing was certain - Belgrade was building and planning!
Looking back at the year 2021 leaves the impression of a civil struggle on all fronts - from continuous preb...
Residential community Davorina Jenka 3a - ideal neighbors
Residents of a Mirije block proved that neighborly solidarity is not a utopian scenario...
Together against hunger and poverty - Solidarity Kitchen
Last March, we were hit by a state of emergency. We were trapped in our homes, nervous…
Tireless neighborhood initiative - joint actions of blocks 70 and 70a
Surely you know at least one person who lives in the blocks and cherishes the block identity - lives for the world...
For a settlement tailored to the tenants - US Stepa Stepanović
The Belgrade settlement of Stepa Stepanović was built a decade ago and today it looks remarkably different...
The forest sings - treetops that mean life
Forest - long walks, high treetops, fresh air, feeling of peace. City - concrete, quick step, zag...
Greenery against gray matter - every seedling is important
Gray bothers us all. Too much concrete and asphalt make our everyday life monotonous. We are eager to cr…
Solar energy as a desirable alternative - energy cooperative Elektropionir
Electricity, on which almost our entire household depends, in Serbia is to the greatest extent pr...
United for a cleaner and more pleasant neighborhood - association of Kotež citizens
Unnecessary division of Belgrade into the right and left banks of the Danube and the neglect of settlements outside the center, un...
Urban gardens and urban beekeeping - UG Econaut
When we talk about the future of a city's development, we're not just talking about built structures, but...
Pandemic ≠ excuse
The city of Belgrade is grossly violating civil rights in its efforts to enact harmful and...
Who needs public property?
Is selling the best way to use and preserve public spaces? Belgrade...


















































